9th ROYAL TANK REGIMENT

WAR DIARY JUNE 1944 to JUNE 1945

 

Function of a War Diary

 

The War Diary of an army unit records details of its activities while in a theatre of war. It is primarily an historical record, and can later be used to trace what happened in an action or campaign. The Diary may be supplemented by Intelligence Summaries, kept either together with the Diary or as a separate set of documents. Information to be recorded includes, but is not limited to:

 

·         Changes in assignment: some units, and 9 RTR was one, came under command of different formations at various times during the campaign. The Diary should show the time, date, and place of such transfers, giving map references of the significant places.

·         Changes in command, establishment, equipment, or organization. These changes should also show time, date, and place. From time to time the Diary should list the names of key personnel in the unit.

·         Before an action, the Diary should record: the intention of the action; any information that could assist the unit commander to achieve his part of the plan, eg strength and disposition of enemy forces and own troops, including support forces such as Air Force, ground and weather conditions etc; plan to achieve the intention, which will include the plan of the unit’s parent formation, and the plan for the unit itself; the unit’s plan will be the basis for issuing orders to subunits; logistical arrangements.

·         At the end of the day’s activities, which could include movement, training, preparation for activities, combat etc: summary of activities during the day, including that of subunits down to appropriate level; preparation of defensive works, including laying of mines;  weather and ground conditions, where they were of significance.

·         Changes to the state of men and equipment, which can include: casualties, including prisoners-of-war taken by the enemy; this will be in summary only, the details being recorded by the Orderly Room; changes to weapons could include loss by enemy action or mechanical failure, or gain by repair or replenishment.

·         Information on the effect of the operations on the enemy: casualties inflicted, prisoners taken, damage to equipment; identification of formations in immediate opposition; any other information gained likely to be of value.

·         If appropriate, care should be taken to provide relevant copies of maps, aerial photographs, and of radio logs if maintained.

Each month, or at the end of a significant operation, the unit commander should write a brief analytical summary based on what has been recorded. Comments by the commander should include the reasons for success or failure, the lessons learned, and what can be done to improve future operations.

 

            War Diary of 9 RTR

            The person with direct responsibility for the War Diary in 9 RTR was the Intelligence Officer (IO). He had many other duties, including the collection, analysis, and onward transmission of intelligence, particularly as it could help the CO in making decisions. The IO was also responsible for the provision of appropriate maps to all subordinate commanders, ensuring where possible that the maps had defence overprints.

In action he was the commander of one of the four RHQ tanks. Thus at the times when the items of greatest significance for the Diary were happening, the IO was subject to the hazards of battle and the jolting rides of cross-country movement. The IO in June 1944 was Lt Frank Haydon. He was promoted to captain and the command of the Recce Troop in September 1944, and Lt Laurie Le Brun, always known as Bruno and previously 13 Troop Leader, was appointed IO.

The War Diary as it appears here was transcribed from the copy of the Diary in possession of the war-time Adjutant, Capt AEW (John) Hodges. There are some differences between that copy of the Diary and what follows. The main differences are:

 

1.       The text has been edited by spelling out in full many of the words recorded as abbreviations, and by some minor re-writing to make the sense clearer.

2.       The original war-time maps with their grids are no longer available. Most, but not all, of the map references have therefore been deleted. The maps provided show most of the locations referred to in the text.

3.       Some illustrations are included to show people, places, and equipment.

 

It must be stressed that although most of the entries in the Diary are factual and correct, there are occasions when what is recorded is contradicted by other records or personal recollections. If any reader wants to use entries in the Diary for research or other purposes, it is strongly recommended that they cross-check the information with other sources.

 

Battalion or Regiment?

 

In talking or writing about the British Army there can be confusion between the words ‘battalion’ and ‘regiment’. A battalion of either infantry or armour is a unit of some 700 soldiers, generally consisting of a Unit HQ, from where all activities of the unit are controlled and co-ordinated, an Administrative or Headquarters sub-unit, and three combat or front-line sub-units. The sub-units are companies in the infantry, batteries in the artillery, and squadrons in the tanks.

The term ‘regiment’ formally stands for an administrative rather than a tactical grouping. For example, the Dorsetshire Regiment comprised several battalions, of which the 4th and 5th were in 43 Infantry Division. Their abbreviated titles were 4 DORSETS and 5 DORSETS  respectively.

The Royal Tank Regiment during World War II consisted of eight regular battalions, four wartime only battalions, and

twelve Territorial battalions. In the deception operation ‘Fortitude’ there were also seven dummy RTR battalions. The 9th was

one of the wartime only battalions.

The history of nomenclature of what started in 1917 as the Tank Corps, became the Royal Tank Corps in 1923, and then became the Royal Tank Regiment as part of the Royal Armoured Corps when that was created shortly before World War II, is

a bit more complicated.

There were battalions in the Tank Corps and the Royal Tank Corps, and they remained battalions in the Royal Tank Regiment. On 1 January 1945 the battalions of the RTR were renamed as regiments, becoming for example: 1st Royal Tank Regiment, 9th Royal Regiment, 48th Royal Tank Regiment. Thus the 9th is referred to in the War Diary as sometimes a battalion

and sometimes as a regiment; abbreviations used include: 9th R Tanks, 9th RTR, and 9 RTR.


LIST OF MAPS

 

1.            Normandy Jun-Jul 44

2.            Epsom form-up

3.            Epsom 1

4.            Epsom 2

5.            Epsom 3

6.            Hill 112 morning

7.            Hill 112 afternoon

8.            Breakout

9.            Bridges

10.           To Le Havre

11.                     Le Havre

12.                     To Holland

13.           Raids in Holland

14.           Clarkeforce

15.                     Roosendaal 1

16.                     Roosendaal 2

17.           Movements Nov 44 to Mar 45

18.           Geilenkirchen

19.           Reichswald plan

20.           Reichswald action

21.           After Reichswald

22.           Broedersbosch


WAR DIARY

11 June to 23 June  1944

Refer Map 1

 

 

 

On June 11, the Advance Party left Aldershot for France and the following day the battalion moved by train and road to the Marshalling Area near Gosport.

After the first week, when everyone had been busy sealing, and the tanks undergoing wading trials, life at Aldershot had been leisurely only to be distributed with excitement as the odd assortment of kit, which included a pamphlet on France and a number of French phrases, “Not to be shown in public”, were distributed.

The Marshalling Area provided less excitement but more entertainment for the final stage of sealing was completed within a few hours of arrival, and departure delayed by heavy seas in the Channel. During the period waiting, every available penny was raked together but, owing to the tax on beer, was soon again in the hands of the Government.

By 18 June the weather was considered sufficiently settled to allow further embarkation, and Battalion Headquarters, A Squadron and part of B Squadron were loaded on L.C.T’s. There were not, however, sufficient of these craft for the whole Battalion, due to the number smashed on the Normandy coast by the rough seas, and the remainder of the Battalion were allotted L.S.T’s, one of which was American – those who were lucky enough to cross on this ship not only had a pleasant journey across, lasting four days, but also enjoyed the pleasant experience of American food. The Channel, however, had not calmed to the extent presumed by the embarkation authorities and neither craft nor ship was able to land until June 21, except for the Echelons which got ashore on June 19. Each craft had a different experience to tell; anchors and kedges had been lost; tanks had broken from their chains and bulged the sides of the craft, causing certain alarm; balloons had broken loose and torn away rigging; and a high percentage of the Battalion experienced the agony of being sea-sick.

The whole Battalion nevertheless had disembarked on Juno Beach by June 22 and concentrated in the area St. Gabriel .

The enemy had remained exceedingly quiet – no aircraft were seen nor did shelling disturb the quiet of those hot summer days. On the coast, except for the broken and damaged craft on the beach, there were none of the ravages of war that later controlled every landscape.

Under the command of viii Corps, the Battalion awaited orders for the first action.


BAPTISM AT CHEUX

24 June to 2 July 1944

Refer Maps 2 ,3, 4, & 5

 

 

 

June 24            On the night of 24 June, the Battalion did a road march to area Secqueville en Bessin and there spent the day resting and preparing for battle. The following night the Battalion left for the forming up point, line of railway  9171 – 9271, and arrived there at 0200 hrs.

                        Using the Caen-Bayeux railway as a start line, the intention was to attack with two Infantry Brigades up supported by a Tank Brigade, and having made a hole in the enemy defences, to pass elements of an Armoured Division through and thus establish a break-out from the original bridgehead.

                        9 RTR were under command 15 (S) Division.

                        The general plan was as follows:-

                        Phase I: 

Right – 7 RTR (less 1 Squadron) in support one Brigade, to cut Tilley-Caen Road and secure high ground Haut du Bosq.

                        Left – 9 RTR (less C Squadron) to attack St. Manvieu – La Gaule.

                        Phase II:

                        With Left flank secured by 15 Recce (1) C Squadron supporting Gordons to capture Colleville and Montrainville, and if possible secure bridgehead over River Orne; (2) one Squadron 7 RTR with one Battalion 227 Bde to capture Grainville sur Odon .

                        Elements of 11 Armoured Division to pass through, seize bridges and then occupy high ground pt 112 and pt 113. RAF support and artillery barrage of about 600 field and heavy guns was to precede the attack.

June 26            The battalion attacking with A and B Squadrons, crossed the start line at 0730 hours, following closely behind the barrage. By 0815 hours the River Mue had been crossed. No strong opposition had yet been met but the infantry found it difficult to clear the enemy from the high crops which provided cover for snipers who were also in the trees. At 0940 hours, house-clearing on the objectives had begun. Armour had been reported in the area South of Cheux, but by 1125 hours objectives were clear, except for one strongpoint in St. Manvieu, which was finally destroyed by CROCS. The infantry dug in and the tanks remained in support to assist in beating off counter-attacks which were made on a small scale south of La Gaule and East of St. Manvieu. No heavy anti-tank guns had been encountered but one tank commander had been killed during the barrage and three tanks damaged. It was estimated that at least two companies of enemy had been killed.

                        At 1515 hours, a regiment of 11 Armoured Division with Recce elements passed through and established themselves on the high ground north of Cheux. The threat of an armoured counter-attack had not yet developed.

At 1915 hours, without artillery support and the expected air attack on Grainville and Colleville, C Squadron began their advance in heavy rain. They pushed across the Tilly-Caen Road and had great difficulty in getting through the sunken narrow roads of Cheux. They eventually got on to the 100 ring contour South of Cheux and moved forward down the slope to support the infantry into Colleville, through the high corn. Heavy anti-tank fire, which included S.P. 88mm’s and Panthers, was encountered on the left flank (supposed to be held by 15 Recce) and to the front.

Continual rain made it difficult to locate the targets and gradually one tank after the other became a casualty. By splitting the Squadron so that half engaged the enemy tanks and SPs, while the remainder pushed on to help the infantry, who were in trouble with mortars and snipers at the approaches to Colleville, there were further casualties. The Gordons actually got to Colleville but not in sufficient strength to hold it and were forced to withdraw under persistent mortar fire.

Some Shermans later moved on to the ridge, but as they never fired a shot it is presumed that they never located a target or conversely were a display of strength for morale purposes only.

By last night, only 6 tanks of C Squadron were still engaged and under cover of darkness these tanks moved forward in an effort to collect the remainder of the infantry still pinned to the ground – not more than a company was found. In the darkness the tanks moved back into Cheux and spent the few remaining hours of the night in a farmyard.

For his determination to achieve his objective despite heavy opposition, Major R.E. Holden, O.C “C” Squadron, was later awarded the M.C.

Neither A nor B Squadrons were relieved until dark and they leaguered on their respective objectives.

The casualties of C Squadron’s action were not as heavy as anticipated. The Churchill proved that it could take a lot of punishment and that it was slow to burn. Three ORs were killed and about ten wounded. Complete write-offs in tanks later proved to be five.

At first light, C Squadron moved to the battalion area north of Cheux.

June 27            A & B Squadrons carried out mopping-up operations south of Cheux in the area Grainville and Colleville. Here again the fighting was fierce with Panthers infiltrating from a flank after an area had been clear, or remaining well camouflaged in an orchard or behind a hedgerow opening up only at point-blank range. Ten Panthers were located in this area and two of our tanks were lost. Lieutenant Mott was severely wounded, having his legs amputated below the knee.

                        By dusk, infantry had been supported into Grainville and Colleville and were firmly established. The tanks leagured north of the Railway.

June 28            By 0950 hours A and B Squadrons had put the Cameronians on the X- roads but the opposition was strong with enemy tanks resisting and counter-attacks being frequently made from the directions of Noyers and Haut de Forges NW to Grainville and Le Valtru. Three Panthers had been destroyed, however, during the day.

June 29            At first light, C Squadron relieved A and B Squadrons and took up a position South of railway crossing at Colleville.

                        Elements of 11 Armoured Division had now crossed River Odon and were in position on Hill 112.

                        C Squadron were shelled and mortared during the day, standing at immediate notice to support infantry should further counter-attacks develop on Grainville.

                        At 1800 hours a strong infantry and tank counter-attack developed; two Panthers had infiltrated into Grainville and German infantry were attacking Le Valtru. C Squadron deployed north-west of X-roads and gave all support possible, and it was estimated that 600 enemy dead were left on the ground as a result. Captain K.A. Kidd, R.O., during the action worked magnificently to maintain co-operation between tanks and infantry, and was later awarded the M.C.

                        Following this abortive attack, an armoured counter-attack was made south of Haut du Bosq but this was also later repulsed.

                        C Squadron remained in position till dark – the only casualties being through mortaring, which had damaged two tanks; five OR’s being wounded.

June 30            11 Armoured Division withdrew during the night, as C Squadron stood by at 0430 hours under the threat of another counter-attack, but nothing developed till the afternoon when 60 tanks of 9 S.S. Panzer attempted to cut off all troops south of Cheux by again attacking Haut Du Bosq – this was also beaten off.

                        C Squadron were relieved by 7 R Tanks and joined the Battalion north of Cheux in time to watch RAF bombing enemy tank concentrations in Villers Bocage area. This was the first time that the RAF had been seen in action and morale rose considerably.

July 1-2           The Battalion stood by to repulse further counter-attacks in conjunction with 43 Division. The plans made were never put into effect – continuous failure had apparently made the Germans accept the inevitable.


 

JUPITER AND HILL 112

3 July to 25 July

Refer Maps 6 & 7

 

 

 

July 2-3                 The general intention of the Higher Command appeared to be the capture of Caen and the clearing of ground to the south-west between the rivers Odon and Orne. Carpiquet 9769 had been reported clear by the Canadians, and Verson 9665 held by 43 Division. Eterville 9864 was, however, held by the enemy. The Battalion was still concentrated north of Cheux and a recce was ordered in conjunction with 130 Brigade (43 Division) of the area Verson – Eterville – Maltot.

 

                     

                             

 

July 10                   At 0300 hours Battalion moved to Forming up Point area Fontaine Etoupefour 9664. The move was covered by Artillery and no difficulties were encountered.

 

                              Battalion Headquarters was established at 944653.

                              At 0500, B Squadron advanced with 5 Dorsets and in fifteen minutes Les Daims 968640 had been taken and only machine gun fire had been encountered.

                              It was known that elements of 10 SS Pz Division threatened left flank and 12 Panthers were  reported roaming in the area of Eterville.

 

                              A troop of 17-pounder S.P. took up positions to guard against this threat while B Squadron pushed on to the Chateau. Resistance was still confined to machine gun fire and snipers, and soon 6, 7 and 8 Troops captured their objective, but one tank had been lost on the left flank, due to anti-tank fire later discovered to be 75/55mm.

 

                              At 0614 hours, the objective was reported secure with the infantry firmly established on the line of the road Fontaine-Etoupefour – Maltot.

 

About 30 prisoners had been taken, a number killed, and at least 6     gun positions destroyed.

 

By 0625, C Squadron were advancing and with Besa fire tearing the corn, the Germans came forward with their hands up. Those that were not killed were taken prisoner and later identified as belonging to 1 and 2 Battalions 22 PGR. As the 4 Dorsets neared Eterville, B Squadron moved up and gave added support from the right flank, destroying 2 unidentified anti-tank guns.

 

The threat from the left still remained, but a further troop of 17-pounder S.P. and 11 Troop of C Squadron were in good positions waiting for the first sign of enemy tanks.

 

By 0735 hours, Eterville had been taken and B Squadron rallied north of Les Daims. Heavy enemy mortar fire was, however, concentrated on Eterville while A Squadron began their advance at 0815 hours supported by B Squadron from right flank.

 

Up to now, the whole attack had gone perfectly, but at 0835 hours A Squadron was severely worried by anti-tank fire from 4 S.P’s in the area 985629, but as soon as an artillery concentration was brought down in this area, 3 Troop reported than ANT was firing from 970622 and that two tanks had been knocked out.

 

At 0933 hours, a strong enemy counter-attack was made on Hill 112 and 7 RTR suffered a number of casualties, including CO and 2IC. The right flank was thretened and anti-tank fire was also reported from the high ground dominating Maltot to west of River Orne. The impetus of the attack was failing – 2 Tigers were in Maltot making the advance of the infantry extremely difficult and A squadron’s movement was hampered by a troop of Tigers dug-in on the reverse slope of Hill 112, firing north-east.

 

At 1156 hours A Squadron were still struggling to support the infantry in Maltot who were now confronted with another Tiger.

 

The German infantry were now counter-attacking and only 9 tanks of A Squadron were left. Major Ballantine, OC A Squadron, dismounted in an attempt to make contact with the Infantry Commander, but was severely wounded by mortar fire and subsequently died.

 

By 1200 hours, 2i/c A Squadron (Capt. Mockford) reported that he only had four tanks capable of fighting and further reports stated that counter-attacks were being made with tanks and infantry from north-east and south-west of Maltot.

 

The Battalion was disposed as follows:-

B Squadron and elements of A squadron in hull-down positions on spur 975628 – 992638  with infantry and anti-tank guns dug in.

C Squadron had joined Battalion Headquarters in forward rally after release by 4 Dorsets. Battalion Headquarters had been mortared and shelled periodically causing severe casualties among the wounded that had been brought in.

 

From 1330-1600 hours, there was a stalemate – the enemy making no attempt to push their counter-attack any further. A new plan was devised whereby one Squadron 7 R Tanks were to put WORCS on Hill 112 and C Squadron to put 4 Dorsets into Maltot. B Squadron were to give support from the right in the opening phase. 4 Armoured Brigade was waiting to go through.

 

The advance began at 1640 hours and, despite anti-tank gunfire from south-west of Maltot, C Squadron had put the infantry into the village by 1700 hours; but 10 minutes later C Squadron were being shot at from the rear, for once again enemy tanks had infiltrated under cover of the spur north-east of Hill 112. 8 Tigers were also moving in on the left flank, and the infantry were pulling out of Maltot under pressure.

 

At 1935 hours, C Squadron was also forced to withdraw under the cover of supporting fire from B Squadron. Mortaring and shelling was almost continuous and at 2030 hours all tanks rallied at the Forming up Point, and later joined A Echelon at 946659  to replenish and collect reinforcements.

 

Casualties suffered were:-

Major Ballantine;

2/Lt. Hendrie and 4 other ranks killed.

Capt. Kirby, Lt. Douglas, Lt. Drew, Lt. Chapman and 28 OR’s wounded; 29 OR’s missing.

 

16 tanks had been destroyed; 6 of which were recoverable.

One Tiger and 1 SP had been completely destroyed and others probably damaged. Enemy infantry casualties, including killed, wounded and prisoners exceeded 200.

 

This rather costly action taught many lessons. Lack of bedding etc. in enemy defence positions proved that at night defence positions were held only by light patrols, and that the main force withdrew to avoid the discomforts of continual shelling; therefore, an infantry attack at night co-ordinated so that tanks would be available at first light would have a greater chance of immediate success.

 

Enemy tanks, however, proved the greatest difficulty – dug-in, camouflaged in orchards and usually positioned on a flank they had every advantage including that of tank-tank fire power. To pin-point their location in battle for use by the artillery was also difficult and, under shellfire, enemy tanks moved to alternative positions that commanded as good a field of fire as before. To make a direct attack on these positions would necessitate the ignoring of the original objective and probably lead to further engagements. For their flank positions, smoke was the only answer, but weather conditions do not always permit a prolonged smoke screen.

 

Enemy counter-attacks made by infantry and tanks were generally successful, because having released supporting tanks our own infantry did not prepare adequate anti-tank defence – mines were never used; PIATs, though effective, were not popular, and there was usually too great a delay in bringing up 17-pounders, the crews of which were unfortunately very exposed to mortar fire. 17-Pounder SP’s were not used in the counter-attack role for they too were vulnerable to mortar and shell fire. Tanks having fought their way to the objective rarely had sufficient ammunition to remain as permanent anti-tank guns, a role hardly suitable for the Churchill.

 

July 11-12             Battalion remained in same location, obtaining reinforcements and replacements which included 10 Mk VII’s, at the same time standing by to assist 7 R Tanks who were still in the area Hill 112, in a counter-attacking role.

 

July 13-16             Battalion moved to 901705 in order to rest and on the night of July 16 moved to relieve 7 R Tanks in counter-attack on Chateau de Fontaine and Hill 112. The supporting Infantry Brigade were 129 Brigade. Battalion moved into position 952644 last light, and all crews began digging deep holes in which to sleep.

 

                              Just after 2300 hours, following mortar and shell fire, the harbour area was attacked by about 6 Ju 88s, who straffed and bombed. Lt- Col. Sir Nugent Everard Bart was wounded in the head and back, together with 7 O.Rs. 1 OR was killed. 2 Stuarts and 2 scout-cars were also damaged. Major Warren took over command. Shelling and mortaring continued throughout the night.

 

July 17                   At first light, HQ, B & C Squadrons moved out to area 955636, Squadrons deployed with 2 troops up. Mortaring continued throughout the day and in retaliation a shoot was carried out by all 75 and 95mm guns, resulting in the silencing of an MG that had been worrying the infantry. An SP was forced to disclose its position and infantry reported a Panther set on fire – no confirmation available. At 1930, a further shoot was made on the centre of St. Martin 9760, which drew heavy retaliation from enemy mortars, resulting in 3 minor casulties.

 

July 18-19             Very similar to July 17 – intervals of mortar and shell fire. Recces and plans made for counter-attack roles. Shoot carried out on Wood 9661 reported to harbour 3 Tigers. Lt. Col. P.N. Veale, M.C., assumed command of the Battalion.

 

July 21                   At 1430 hours, an enemy counter-attack threatened and B Squadron moved up to crest to give moral support to infantry. Heavy mortaring resulted in Major Warren and 2 ORs being wounded – no counter-attack developed, but a party towed away a number of dead cows whose stench did more to lower morale than the persistent mortaring and shelling.

 

                              7 R Tanks brought up into area to attack Maltot to correspond with Canadian attack on Etavaux 0062. Following the attack but corresponding with Canadian attack on St. Andre sur Orne 0161, 9 R Tanks were ordered to be prepared to attack Feuguerolles sur Orne 9961 and St. Martin 9760.

 

July 22                   1815 hours. Support given to 7 R Tanks attack on Maltot with 75 and 95mm fire aimed at Nebelwerfers in area 70 ring contour 9860, 9861. First shoot drew heavy mortaring but there was no reply to the second shoot. During this time, Major Holden got mixed up with his Slidex and reported “Dead”. Persisting in this report, he was advised to call skeleton “O” Groups.

 

July 23-25             The intensity of mortaring and shelling decreased and a further shoot was carried out on 88 located at 956614, but no further orders were received concerning attack on Feuguerolles and St. Martin. On 25 July, after watching rocket-firing Typhoons brassing up enemy positions south of Caen, the Battalion received orders to move to Fontenay Le Pesnil 8867.

 

                              After nine days of air attack at night and shelling and mortaring at all times during the day and night, no-one was sorry to leave.

 

                              The attack on Feuguerolles and St. Martin, which was to have been done down a valley dominated on both sides by enemy positions, had not promised to be the best of adventures either.


MINES AND THE BOCAGE

26 July to 12 August

Refer Map 8

 

 

July 26          After a night march, the battalion concentrated at Fontenay Le Pesnil 966669, and here came under command 59 Division. The Battalion had the task of supporting 176 Brigade in counter-attack roles on three positions – Haut du Bosq 9066; Rauray 8865; Pt 126 and Brettevillette 8864. The country in this area had been heavily mined by the enemy; it consisted of small fields bounded by thick hedgerows and ditches, and was undoubtedly the most difficult tank country that the battalion had yet encountered. The field of vision was generally less than 100 yards and in any deployed movement there could not be any visual contact between troops; large tree stumps, torn and gashed by shellfire, together with the deep ditches  provided natural tank obstacles. It was essential that each area was very carefully reconnoitered so that, should an emergency arise, each tank commander would know beforehand the exact line of advance of each tank. These areas were under constant shell and mortar fire, which added to the difficulties, and at 1800 hours B Squadron suffered a most unfortunate disaster. The troop leaders of this Squadron went forward for a rendezvous with Major Reynell, who was then making his plan just north of Brettevillette 8864. Dismounting from the track, an “S” mine was exploded, resulting in the deaths of Lt. Wolskel, Lt. Smart and Sgt. Nichols. Lt. Beale and Lt. Cargill were wounded and the latter died a few days later.

 

July 31          The reconnaissance and forming of plans for these three counter-attack roles lasted a couple of days, and finally, on 31 July, a demonstration was given by two troops of “C” Squadron with a company of 7 Norfolks in the method that had been adopted in clearing this type of country. Each hedgerow was to be considered as an objective and artillery fire would be brought down on this line until raised by the infantry command to the ground. Simultaneously with artillery targets I, Targets II and III would be engaged. For the first phase, tanks would sit at the starting line and engage hedgerows on flanks, keeping fire in front of infantry who would advance along these hedgerows.

 

                     Phase I would be complete when infantry reached the corner of the field and tanks would then concentrate their fire to hedge immediately to their front which had previously been engaged only by hull MGs.

 

                     The infantry would now use LMGs from positions in corner of field to engage next hedge to their front and, following a verey signal, tanks would move as fast as possible to the opposite hedgerow and the clearing would advance a further stage.

 

                     It is necessary to point out that as soon as artillery fire was lifted from target I it would move to target II.

 

                     In the case of the attack being made with 2 companies and 2 troops (which was most likely) it was essential that closest co-operation be maintained so that no advance moved faster than the other, otherwise casualties would be inflicted by own fire.

                     To ensure this co-operation, all troops of each Squadron practiced this method with their respective infantry; 26 Squadron Assault Regiment Royal Engineers also helped by using petards and bulldozers to make gaps in the hedgerows.

 

An experiment was made with artificial moonlight or movement light from searchlights, so that infantry might attack at night, and having secured their objective have tanks in position at first light to repulse any possible counter-attack. This too was quite successful, the light provided being adequate for movement.

 

August 1       An experiment was carried out to test the effectiveness of the Projectile Infantry Anti-Tank (PIAT) against the glacis plate of a Panther; complete penetration was not obtained and it was discovered that the cement veneer covering the Panther did much to nullify the effect of the PIAT bomb; the substance crumbled and prevented firm contact being made before the bomb itself exploded.

 

                     A 75mm hollow charge shell used by the 75mm Gun, carried by Airborne troops, was also obtained and by inserting this into the case of the 75mm tank gun, it was also possible to try its effect on the glacis plate of the Panther. Complete penetration was not obtained but in all cases the tank would have been knocked out.

                     Since 29 July 1944, 197 Brigade (59 Division) had been patrolling in strength, sometimes assisted by tanks of 7 R Tanks, and the general impression gained from prisoners of war was that the enemy were withdrawing under pressure of concentrated artillery fire, together with lack of food, sleep and at times ammunition.

 

1700           Orders were received that 59 Division with 31 Tank Brigade in support would capture Pt 213 on Villers Bocage – Caen Road, one mile north-east of Villers Bocage.

 

The main plan was in two phases:-

Phase I:   197 Brigade with 2 Squadrons 7 R Tanks in support and 2 troops C squadron 22 Dragoons under command, to feel forward and contact enemy.

Phase II: On contact, attack to be made with 2 Brigades up:-

Right – 176 Brigade with 9 R Tanks in support.

Left – 177 Brigade with one Squadron 7 R Tanks in support.

26 Squadron ARE; 2 troops 22 Dgns, and 304 Anti-tank  SPRA under command Division Boundary: Right – Main Road Villy Bocage 0259 – Les Fains 6361 – Juvigny 8466.

Left – line of 87 Easting.

 

9 R Tanks plan was as follows:-

To attack with 2 squadrons up supporting 2 Battalions.

Right – C Squadron in support 7 Norfolks with Flail and AVRE support.

Left – A Squadron in support 7 S. Staffs with Flail and AVRE support.

B Squadron with 6 N. Staffs to give right flank protection while one Squadron 7 R Tanks secured the left flank by attacking the area Pt. 142.

 

Boundaries:

Right – Main road Villy Bocage – Les Fains.

Left – Road-rail crossing 849590 – X- roads Monts 8561 – road-track junction 864639.

Probable start line – Rd 835625 – Monts 8561.

 

2/3 August    During August 2 and 3, 197 Brigade continued to patrol forward, meeting little opposition but encountering large quantities of mines, both anti-tank and “S”. At 1700 hours August 3, pt. 142 and Villy Bocage had been secured and leading infantry were held up 500 yards short of pt. 213.

 

1900           Battalion less B Squadron move to forward assembly area, 851646 where they were joined by B Squadron the following morning. No specific orders to attack had yet been received, though the C.O. went to attend an “O” Group at 0100 hours only to find it had been cancelled without him being informed.

 

4 August       By 1200 hours, 197 Brigade reported that they had crossed Villers Bocage – Caen Road and that no firm contact had been made with the enemy. Two hours later, 176 Brigade and 9 R Tanks were informed that they were now at 30 minutes notice to move, and at an “O” held at 835588, the following orders were given:-

                     9 R Tanks supporting 176 Brigade were to secure high ground formed by pts 158 (852562), 185 (861548) and 192 (817556).

                     Method:   A Squadron with 7 S. Staffs to pt 158.

                                    C Squadron with 7 N. Staffs to pt 185.

                                    B Squadron with 6 N. Staffs to pt 192.

                     Battalion Headquarters to be established at Le Mesnil Hervieu 9455 and 176 Headquarters Epinay sur Odon.

 

1500           Battalion begins to move. Orders were received from a divisional source that main road could be used only as far as Les Fains owing to mines and that from then on a cross-country route, which had been beaten by FLAILS, would be used. The main road was, however, subsequently cleared and the Squadrons ferrying their infantry as far as Villers Bocage, pushed onto their objectives, which they reached by nightfall.

 

This being the first occasion on which it had been possible to make any substantial advance, the road became blocked with traffic, so Headquarters moved along the cross-country route and waited at 837591 to allow Villers Bocage which was a veritable “bottle-neck” to clear.

 

Here, further orders were given by Commander 176 Brigade for the following day. The intention of the Brigade was to make a thrust to contact, and, if possible, gain a bridgehead across River Orne. An advance was to be made on two-thrust lines:-

Right – C Squadron with 7 Norfolks.

Route:- pt 200 – Courvadon – Nidalos – Montigny – La Canie Goupil